Five church planting dangers

Here’s an expanded version of five church planting dangers that I mentioned in a previous post. An edited version of this post appeared recently on the Gospel Coalition website (although for some reason they substituted the brief biography that I provided with one that’s out of date. Go figure!)

1. Planting a replica church

This church plant is a clone of your sending church or your own previous experience. This tends to be what happens if you don’t think much about the culture and values of the new church. You default to your past experience. This, of course, may not be an altogether bad thing. But it is a missed opportunity. Church planting is an opportunity to rethink church, creating patterns of church life that are more faithful to Scripture and more relevant to the culture. The other danger is that you try to be a large church with a small church planting team instead of seizing the advantages of being a small church.

What’s good about this: You’re a fool if you disregard 2,000 years of church history. So we need learn for Christian tradition and appreciate the Spirit’s work through the church in the past.

Constructive principle: Be creative.

2. Planting a reactionary church

This, in some ways, is the opposite of a replica church. This is what happens when people have had a bad experience of church. Church planting for some people is a way of running away for church rather than resolving issues or reconciling broken relationships. For other people the church plant is defined primarily in terms of what it’s not. People know exactly what they don’t want church to be like. But without a positive vision, the resulting church tends to have a negative culture or a culture that’s suspicious of other churches or which feels superior to them.

What’s good about this: We don’t want to repeat the mistakes of the past and church planting is a opportunity to create something fresh – as long as you have a positive, biblical vision for what you want to be.

Constructive principle: Be positive.

3. Planting a romantic church

Remember all those conversations over a drink on a Sunday evening as you dreamed with your friends of your ideal church? Perhaps you dreamed of meeting in a coffee shop with some mellow jazz music in the background while you discussed faith with your friends over a latte. Perhaps you dreamed of rocking out the Christian classics you grew up with. Perhaps you dreamed of hour-long sermons rich with theology. And now your church plant is a chance to create this church of which you and your friends always dreamed. The problem is that, while you might create a church ideally suited to you, the chances are it will not be missional. Your personal set of favourite features won’t necessarily create an ideal context to invite unbelievers (which also means it won’t be an ideal church for Christians either for healthy Christian living must be missional).

What’s good about this: Church planters are often idealists driven by a vision of what could be. This will help you push towards creating a church that continually attempts to be more biblical and more relevant.

Constructive principle: Be missional.

4. Planting a restorationist church

This church plant is an attempt accurately to recreate what the church was like in the first century, to restore apostolic Christianity. Churches like this tend to spend a lot of time trying to identify precisely the patterns of New Testament practice. Of course it’s vital to be biblical. But replicating apostolic norms can be a futile exercise, not least because there seems to have been quite of bit of diversity within the New Testament. And that diversity existed because the apostolic churches were adapting to their contexts, both to the people within the church and the people they were trying to reach. The real danger with the restorationist mind-set is that you become inward-looking.

You end up having long debates over how exactly the New Testament churches celebrated the Lord’s Supper rather than throwing yourself into evangelism. You become like the people described in 1 Timothy 1 who are more interested in winning converts from within the church than winning converts to Christ.

What’s good about this: We do need to be biblical. One of the joys of church planting is the opportunity to rethink the way we do church to ensure it is faithful to Scripture and relevant to the culture.

Constructive principle: Be contextual.

5. Planting a reductionist church

In some ways this is the opposite of a restorationist church. Here the desire is to plant a church which is ‘incarnational’ or ‘missional’ or ‘contextualized’ (or whatever is your favoured buzz word). But you understand these terms to mean creating a church which closely resembles the surrounding culture. This concern can too easily lead to attempts to minimize the differences and therefore to minimize the confrontation the gospel brings. True contextualization includes identifying what repentance means in a culture. So it’s not about reducing the challenge of the gospel, but understanding the culture well enough so that we heighten or focus the challenge of the gospel. The danger facing such churches is that they reduce the gospel and assimilate to the wider culture. In the end they have nothing to offer. If we’re so like the culture that the differences are marginal, why should the culture bother with us? We will have nothing to add to what they already believe. Beside which, it’s a fool’s errand: we will never be as a ‘cool’ at MTV! What will be attractive to a lost world is the gospel we proclaim and the distinctive community life it creates (remembering that ‘distinctive’ is another word for ‘holy’).

What’s good about this: The desire to be contextual is good. We should try to minimise anything off-putting that is part of our church culture, but not part of the gospel.

Constructive principle: Be biblical.


Support this site by using these links:

includes Tim Chester’s books
20% of every thinkivp purchase goes
to train Christian leaders in poorer countries

7 thoughts on “Five church planting dangers

  1. I love the balance that you strike here with each of these church-planting dangers. I feel like it is easy to take passion, urgency, and a desire to be be different or correct past ills in any direction, without having a healthy, Biblical balance. Your perspective here is one more churches really need to think through and embrace, whether it is a new church-plant or a longstanding church within a given community or context. Cheers Tim!

  2. Pingback: Five church planting dangers | Exponential

  3. You are right on…it is so tempting to be the church WE want to be rather than the church GOD wants us to be. Thanks for the good article.
    Terry Reed
    Small Church Tools

  4. As a pioneer in the c of e, I keep going back to what it means to be Anglican. Sounds crazy to many friends since they conclude that I must be rejecting church to be missional (yep, ours is a coffee church… No not cafechurch, coffee church….network that meets in coffee shops…). Cut me n half and I scram Anglican. That doesn’t mean though that I’m not contextualised, or incarnational, we form church around those who come. But the balance of me keep asking “what might make this Anglican” forces me to keep the various ponts in tension, I think. And if anyone wonders what it means to be Anglican…go read some books ;-). Mission, scriture, tradion, reason….it’s all in there.

  5. Pingback: Wednesday Link List « Thinking Out Loud

  6. Pingback: Preaching to women who work in the home… and some other great links. | Evangelicals Now

Comments are closed.